What is the Difference Between Informed and Implied Consent?

by vtaylor
What is the difference between implied and informed consent?

In the realm of healthcare, patient consent is a crucial ethical and legal consideration. Two primary forms of consent, informed and implied, govern the patient-doctor relationship. Understanding their distinctions is essential for both patients and healthcare professionals. This relationship is made all the more pressing when a healthcare professional does something negligent after informed or implied consent has been given. It is important to know how informed and implied consent differ, as well as how these forms of consent may impact a medical malpractice case.

Key Takeaways

  • Informed consent involves an explicit written agreement after a discussion and respects a patient’s autonomy.
  • Implied consent is inferred and is often seen in routine or emergency situations.
  • Patients have the unequivocal right to change or withdraw consent until the medical procedure begins.
  • Waivers provide some legal protection but are not absolute shields, especially in cases of gross negligence or insufficient information.
  • Implied consent relies on inferred willingness from actions, while informed consent demands detailed understanding and active agreement based on comprehensive information.

What is Informed Consent?

Informed consent, a bedrock of patient autonomy, involves the explicit agreement of the patient, typically documented in writing. This agreement follows a comprehensive discourse wherein the healthcare provider furnishes the patient with detailed information about a proposed treatment or procedure. On an informed consent form, you will either find or be asked to provide the following information:

  • Your patient information
  • Healthcare provider information
  • The description of the procedure or treatment, including the purpose of the treatment
  • The patient’s diagnosis or medical condition, as well as the proposed intervention
  • An explanation of the risks and benefits associated with the procedure or treatment
  • Details on the expected outcome
  • A statement emphasizing that the patient is agreeing to the treatment or procedure of their own volition, and that they do so with a clear mind
  • Assurance that the patient understands the information provided by the healthcare professional
  • Any further consent for specific actions
  • Witness signature
  • Signature and date from the patient

What is Implied Consent?

In contrast, implied consent is not explicitly articulated but inferred from a patient’s actions or the contextual circumstances. This assumption is grounded in the patient’s behavior or the nature of the medical situation. Routine procedures like vaccinations or blood draws often elicit implied consent, where the patient’s actions imply a willingness to proceed. However, the validity of implied consent is context-dependent and may not be universally applicable.

How Should You Give Informed Consent?

Obtaining informed consent is a meticulous process, typically involving a comprehensive discussion between the healthcare provider and the patient. This dialogue may be facilitated through a medical authorization form containing all pertinent information, ensuring that patients are well-informed participants in decisions about their care.

Healthcare providers must engage in open and honest communication with patients, fostering an environment where questions are welcomed, and information is exchanged transparently. The use of written documentation, such as a medical authorization form, serves as tangible evidence that the patient has been adequately informed and has willingly agreed to the proposed intervention.

Can You Change Your Mind About Consent?

The right to change one’s mind about consent is fundamental to the concept of voluntary decision-making in healthcare. Individuals may find themselves reconsidering a medical procedure, treatment, or intervention for various reasons, including newfound information, emotional shifts, or evolving personal beliefs. It is crucial to recognize that, up until the medical procedure has commenced, patients have the unequivocal right to alter or withdraw their consent.

Changing one’s mind about consent involves a process of effective communication with the healthcare provider. Open and honest dialogue ensures that the patient’s concerns, questions, or reservations are addressed, and the healthcare team can adapt to the evolving preferences of the individual. While patients are encouraged to express their decisions clearly, healthcare professionals also bear the responsibility of explaining any potential consequences or risks associated with altering or withdrawing consent.

Furthermore, the ability to change one’s mind underscores the principle of respect for autonomy, emphasizing that healthcare decisions should align with an individual’s values and preferences. Recognizing this right empowers patients to actively participate in their healthcare journey and fosters a collaborative relationship between patients and healthcare providers.

Does Signing a Waiver Protect Healthcare Professionals From Being Sued?

In the context of healthcare, waivers and consent forms are common instruments used to establish an agreement between patients and healthcare providers regarding the risks, benefits, and potential outcomes of medical procedures. While these documents serve as legal safeguards, it is essential to understand their scope and limitations in protecting healthcare professionals from legal action.

Signing a waiver does provide some level of legal protection for healthcare professionals, as it demonstrates that the patient was informed about the inherent risks and willingly accepted them. However, the protection afforded by waivers is not absolute. If a patient experiences harm due to negligence, substandard care, or a deviation from the standard of care, a waiver may not fully shield healthcare professionals from legal consequences.

Waivers are typically effective for known risks associated with a procedure, and they may not cover instances of gross negligence, intentional misconduct, or situations where the information provided to the patient was insufficient or misleading. Courts may scrutinize the validity of waivers, especially if they are overly broad, unclear, or if there is evidence of coercion or duress.

Healthcare professionals should recognize that the primary focus should be on delivering care that meets established standards, prioritizing patient safety, and ensuring comprehensive communication about potential risks. While waivers offer a layer of protection, they do not absolve healthcare providers from the obligation to deliver competent and ethical care.

What is the Main Difference Between Implied and Informed Consent?

Now that you know a bit more about implied and informed consent, let’s look at how each of these forms have unique characteristics in the healthcare setting:

Implied Consent

Implied consent is not explicitly verbalized or documented but is instead inferred from a patient’s actions or the surrounding circumstances. It arises when a patient’s behavior implies a willingness to undergo a certain medical intervention. For example, when a patient extends their arm to receive a routine flu shot or presents themselves for a routine physical exam, their actions imply consent for those specific procedures.

This form of consent is often associated with emergency situations where immediate action is required, and the patient is unable to communicate or provide explicit consent. Implied consent allows healthcare providers to act in the best interest of the patient’s well-being when time-sensitive decisions are necessary.

However, it is crucial to note that the scope of implied consent is limited to the actions or behaviors reasonably associated with the situation. It does not encompass complex or high-risk procedures where explicit, informed consent is imperative.

Informed Consent

Informed consent, on the other hand, is a more explicit and detailed form of consent. It involves a comprehensive and transparent communication process between the healthcare provider and the patient, ensuring the individual is fully informed about the nature of a proposed medical procedure, potential risks, benefits, alternatives, and any other relevant information.

Informed consent is typically obtained in writing through the patient’s signature on a specific consent form. This form serves as evidence that the patient received and understood the pertinent information and voluntarily agreed to the proposed intervention. The process of obtaining informed consent encourages dialogue, questions, and the opportunity for the patient to seek clarification before making a decision.

In short, the main difference between implied and informed consent lies in the degree of explicitness and the depth of information conveyed. While implied consent relies on inferred willingness from actions, informed consent demands a detailed understanding of the proposed medical intervention and the patient’s active agreement based on comprehensive information.

How Can Consent Impact a Medical Malpractice Case?

Consent plays a critical role in medical malpractice cases, influencing the legal and ethical aspects of healthcare. The impact of consent on a medical malpractice case can vary based on the nature of the alleged malpractice, the clarity of communication between healthcare providers and patients, and the adherence to established standards of care.

Negligence in a medical malpractice case often involves a breach of the duty owed to the patient. Obtaining informed consent is part of the duty owed by healthcare providers to their patients. If a healthcare professional fails to obtain valid consent or does not adequately inform the patient, it may be considered a breach of duty. This breach can be a central point in establishing negligence, a key component of medical malpractice claims.

Informed consent is not only about providing information; it is also about allowing patients to make decisions based on that information. If a patient is not properly informed and subsequently experiences harm, the lack of informed consent may be linked to the causation of the injury. Establishing a direct connection between the lack of proper consent and the harm suffered is essential in demonstrating causation, a crucial element in proving a medical malpractice case.

Consent forms, medical records, and documentation of communication between healthcare providers and patients serve as crucial evidence in medical malpractice cases. They can provide a clear record of what information was provided, what the patient understood, and the agreement reached. Conversely, if there is a lack of documentation or if the consent process was not adequately conducted, it may be used as evidence supporting the patient’s claim of negligence and lack of informed consent.

Contact the Medical Malpractice Lawyers of Raynes & Lawn Today

Informed and implied consent are forms of consent often used within the healthcare field. However, if that consent was breached in some way, such as with wrong or inaccurate information, you may be eligible for a medical malpractice claim. If you or a loved one suffered harm as the result of mishandled consent, please call Raynes & Lawn today at 1-800-535-1797 or fill out the contact form. Our experienced Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyers are here to advocate for your rights and ensure you get the compensation you deserve.



For the general public:  This Blog/Website is made available by the law firm publisher, Raynes & Lawn, for educational purposes. It provides general information and a general understanding of the law but does not provide specific legal advice. By using this site, commenting on posts, or sending inquiries through the site or contact email, you confirm that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Website publisher. The Blog/Website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

For attorneys:  This Blog/Website is informational in nature and is not a substitute for legal research or a consultation on specific matters pertaining to your clients.  Due to the dynamic nature of legal doctrines, what might be accurate one day may be inaccurate the next. As such, the contents of this blog must not be relied upon as a basis for arguments to a court or for your advice to clients without, again, further research or a consultation with our professionals.